|
Post by Mr. P on Mar 20, 2007 21:02:25 GMT -5
at the ppv after cyber kenetics you should have a match with every body who is a champion against eachother for the champion of champions.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Mar 21, 2007 1:03:20 GMT -5
That would be pointless, as whoever the United Champ is would have to win. If they didn't, it would devalue the Title even more than the fact that it's changed hands so many times. And if it did it would be predictable and no-one would really care.
the only reason the WWE had a CoC was because they had 3 first tier titles and that Booker was about to drop the title to Batista. This would mean that even though he won the match, the CoC was still in doubt. It also acted as a trade-off.
|
|
|
Post by T-Bone on Mar 21, 2007 15:05:39 GMT -5
Booker won the match because he was defending the title. If any other title was defended, he wouldn't have won.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Mar 23, 2007 2:56:44 GMT -5
The WWE knew no other title would be defended because Booker was the only heel. Also, I read somewhere that in WWE's disclaimer for the PPV, they effectively reserve the right to alter the votes or something along those lines.
|
|