|
Post by T-Bone on Sept 22, 2007 12:54:22 GMT -5
I think this may stop the whole "I won't go first so the other guy can post longer crap". SO yes or no folks
|
|
|
Post by Mr. P on Sept 22, 2007 16:44:13 GMT -5
yes just because then you won't have wrestlemania like matches all the time.
I also think it should be slightly smaller for the second poster for two reasons:
1) More action happens in the second half of the match 2) It'll give people extra incentive to rp faster
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Sept 23, 2007 1:28:52 GMT -5
I don't see why this is neccessary or why anyone would want it. If you have a problem with people RPing late, then why don't you do your RP first? Pretty much everyone who votes yes for this system and doesn't RP first is a hypocrite. Also, you wouldn't even need this if staff ended matches when they were meant to be ended. Giving people a week to do an entrance and an RP is ludicrous.
As for P: 1.) If you RP first you can make it so that it would be ridiculous to have heaps of action. Also, none of you know how to actually start a match properly and build it because you're all so obsessed with RPing last. Another reason for the people complaining to RP first. 2.) If matches were ended on time a loss would be enough incentive. And quite frankly, the reason you all came here is to RP. Now it seems you'd all prefer to socialise - which is fine, but if you can't do your RPs then you should lose.
If you want to give people incentive to RP, put them in matches that actually mean something, rather than just throw together matches. Quite frankly if someone apart from T-bone puts me in what I feel is a stupid match I'll take myself off the card since no one apart from T-bone actually has an inkling of how to book.
|
|
|
Post by .jhardy on Sept 23, 2007 2:42:38 GMT -5
I'm F***** either way
|
|