|
Post by He Who Must Not Be Named on Jul 9, 2007 22:07:13 GMT -5
78 for Virus
|
|
|
Post by redman on Jul 9, 2007 22:18:40 GMT -5
umm i think Redman is around low 70's
|
|
|
Post by .jhardy on Jul 10, 2007 2:36:01 GMT -5
I'd rate RedMan either 72 or 73
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Jul 10, 2007 3:05:37 GMT -5
How does this system work. 'Cuasu from what i can gather,cthe lowest rating would probably be 60. Shouldn't the lowest be closer to, oh I don't know, ZERO!
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Jul 10, 2007 5:21:59 GMT -5
the only way this would work was if there was a rating system of 1 to 10 where people placed a number for everyone. Then an average was worked out and multiplied by 10 to get a mark out of 100.
|
|
|
Post by Remember Me? on Jul 10, 2007 5:24:56 GMT -5
That sounds pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Jul 10, 2007 5:32:29 GMT -5
The only problem would be that if someone gave someone else a back mark, then the person who got the bad mark would return the favour. So we'd probably just have a bunch of guys giving 6-10's rather than below 5's.
|
|
|
Post by Remember Me? on Jul 10, 2007 5:35:48 GMT -5
Maybe if T-Bone just gave out a mark for everyone judging by their RPing or their character's personlity and how well they play them etc.....
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Jul 10, 2007 5:41:09 GMT -5
T-bone already gets enough sh1t as it is. i don't think he'd be willing to cop more because he gave wrestler x 5/10 and wrestler y 6/10. Oh, wait a minute, a lightbulb just went off. Why not make a thread for each wrestler and have a poll from 0 to 10. then no-one will know who voted for who.
|
|
|
Post by Remember Me? on Jul 10, 2007 6:34:44 GMT -5
Now that's a good idea.
|
|
|
Post by Dusk on Jul 10, 2007 13:28:15 GMT -5
And what about if they improve? will there be another poll?
|
|
|
Post by Mr. P on Jul 10, 2007 16:06:35 GMT -5
no, then someone just says, "this guy improved, make him better" and t bone says yes or no
|
|
|
Post by Dusk on Jul 10, 2007 16:22:53 GMT -5
but how do we know how much he's changed? if he was a 2 and then improved severly, he's only going to go up 1? or do you mean we put the decision on T's shoulders again?
|
|
|
Post by Mr. P on Jul 10, 2007 19:28:37 GMT -5
idk, we'll get to that when we have to deal with it.
|
|