|
Post by Booker T on Aug 27, 2007 23:32:08 GMT -5
Matches up. I gave you guys over a week so if you don't see your match up there too bad.
Edit: the triple threat has Jamez instead of Virus.
Also, if you're going to critisise a match, please make reasonable points. No one likes tall-poppy syndrome.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 27, 2007 23:38:50 GMT -5
After you vote try and give a reason or something along with your vote. Unless of course you just voted for the match you were in.
|
|
|
Post by He Who Must Not Be Named on Aug 28, 2007 6:02:02 GMT -5
I dont think I ever faced HBB and IK in a Triple Threat, I think that was Jamez
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 28, 2007 7:07:57 GMT -5
Ok, Fixed.
|
|
|
Post by Dusk on Aug 28, 2007 11:42:51 GMT -5
Skate Park Brawl- didn't know we ever had one
if the triple threat match was the champion of champions match- that was pretty cool, but I don't think people will ever remember it.
ROI 1- unrealistic
ROI 2- Buster's entrance said he had an injured shoulder. Some of the things said require both arms. Hitting your finisher in your post is pretty lame tbh. A moonsault elbow drop from a lader in an unbalanced ring that's 10 feet above the air to a guy on two tables on an announce table. Both make it into the ring under 2 minutes? Even more unrealistic
DoD 1- RP sucked
DoD 2- unrealistic
IK vs SS vs Duke- Virus was new to it so the RP should have ended it. I didn't post cause hell I needed to lose so I could go to Colombia, an NPC in a United Title match speaks for itself.
SS vs Mr.P- I'll just say that RPing wasn't in anyone's favor at that time.
Flaming Casket Match- unrealistic
MY vote- MITB 2, it's the only thing left
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 28, 2007 16:48:53 GMT -5
Skate Park Brawl- didn't know we ever had one ok. See above What was unrealistic? The finish was T-bone's idea and was required for the Reaper storyline, which you seemed to be a fan of, but everything else was within reason. Buster's injury was exploited and he wasn't able to do some moves during the match because of it. Back then everyone hit their finishers in their post A normal ladder is 12 feet, so that point's out. And it was a table and an announcer's table. You really need to watch some ladder/TLC matches to get an idea of what's realistic. Well you were in both those matches so I won't dispute any of that. Um...point? Still was a decent match and held people's interest content wise. That's what happens when you have Maverick Jones contribute in any way, shape or form. Within two lines HBB almost broke his neck. The first post (3 paragraphs) had like seven finishing moves, oh but that's not "lame tbh"? The rest wasn't anything special apart from someone going through an announcers table. Pretty disappoiting considering the standard expected of ladder matches. Most of the "unrealistic" points mentioned don't make sense at all, unless of course you're just critising for the sake of it, which seems to be likely.
|
|
|
Post by Cody Rivers on Aug 29, 2007 14:22:52 GMT -5
About the Skate Park Brawl - that was on the card I booked. No one ever showed up for it, which I consider disappointing because I thought it was a pretty original concept.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 29, 2007 16:51:58 GMT -5
If no-one showed up why the f*ck did you nominate it.
|
|
|
Post by Dusk on Aug 29, 2007 17:52:44 GMT -5
ROI2- 12 foot ladder +10 feet above ground=22 feet above the ground yet was still balanced? The fact that you sustained no injury with the momentum onto a guy ontop of a table and an announcer's table making it up into the ring under two minutes after that, Buster WITH a messed up arm-unrealistic, plain and simple. P.S.-read all my matches, never pulled an Ice Breaker
IK vs SS vs Duke- Rigged
SS vs Mr.P- only YOU talk about that match
ROI1-you said it yourself, the ending
MITB2- when they do it, no.
I comment to give people an idea before bandwagoning to SS vs Mr.P cause it ha two Big Named superstars in it.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 29, 2007 18:07:59 GMT -5
WTF? Do you have any idea what you're talking about? Since when ring's become 10 ft. tall? Please explain that one to me because I've never seen that before. The ring was 10ft above the ground and there were ladders on each corner, plain and simple. Stop trying to bend the truth. In fact, that would probably be classed as an outright lie. And we sustained no injury? Ok, lets all just ignore the fact that we both crawled into the ring bloodied up and The Crusader did most of the work after that. And also, you lied: www.dodgegt5.proboards99.com/index.cgi?board=aggg&action=display&thread=1170563871And you've also lied about the triple threat. When the match was over you said you didn't RP because you had graduation or some sh1t. Well SS v. P has two votes. Neither of them were mine and I doubt they were P's, so you look like a moron now. And the RoI ending was required to get rid of T-bone. It's his fed so I guess it's up to him what's realistic & what's not. He wrote that bit in so as far as he's concerned, it's realistic. No, you blantantly disregarded any faults in MITB 2 which you mentioned in other matches. I guess we're feeling hypocritical today are we? And pretty much the definition of bandwagonning is voting for a sub-par, unrealistic match with ridiculous pyschology because someone with power tells you to tbh.
|
|
|
Post by He Who Must Not Be Named on Aug 29, 2007 18:57:15 GMT -5
I voted for MITB 2
ROI1- Werent you the only one who posted for the match and then T ended it? ROI2-Buster held the title for a while, then lost it, kinda saw it coming DoD1-Both werent as good at rp'ing as they are now, so it was ok DoD2-Same Thing, but with a new winner and better rp SP-Sounds like more of a Free Rp so it isnt that great of an idea unless it is free rp IK vs SS vs Duke- DUke was obviously gonna lose and IK said he was going to leave but hje could have at least posted a bit(no offence) even though we basically knew who would win SS vs Reaper- I loved this match, but I hated the edning on how T lost and IW won. And The Reaper ID should have been a better character like Nathan Cadge COC Match- Ik was gonna win this one and everybody knew it LMS Match- I wanted to pick this one, but the ending seemed kinda wacky
so MITB2
|
|
|
Post by Dusk on Aug 29, 2007 19:23:01 GMT -5
That's what I meant, 10 feet above the ground. As it was said in T-Bone's description of the first ROI. read it again, 10 feet ABOVE GROUND No injury from the moonsault elbow drop. Hey I did. Oh well, at least it was in February when we started and not two months ago when people would expect more of me. Vacation would be some sh1t. Graduation was the Thursday after the PPV and practice was the Thursday and Friday before Graduation. Match Card posted on May 20th, I would have plenty of time if Graduation was the factor. I was informed that my vacation would be June 12th, so I dropped the title if I was on a two week leave. Unfortunately, the home in Colombia didn't have space for us so we pushed the vacation to July 14th. Didn't feel I had to explain this as it truely is none of your business. I never said either of you voted. Two big named superstars with the greatest titles fighting for an even greater unification in an LMS, the explaination could drive people to vote for it. Except for HBB, they were new. hell of a lot more impressive than what we did when we were new. band·wag·on(bând'wâg'ən) noun 1. a popular trend that attracts growing support there you go I believe we were to critisise matches, not the person that votes.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 29, 2007 21:01:26 GMT -5
That's what I meant, 10 feet above the ground. As it was said in T-Bone's description of the first ROI. read it again, 10 feet ABOVE GROUND Nice try but you just completely contradicted yourself. Your point? All of a sudden if you have a spot you have to be injured? What kind of logic is that. It is when you use it as an arguement against me Well if only I talked about it, how did two other people vote for it? The general standard was also a lot lower when we were new. We were at the top of the pile and there was no incentive to be that much better. When these guys came along, the general standard was so much higher that either they went by it or they'd be jobbers. Also, the match sucked and made little sense. That was my main point. Just because they were new doesn't make them impervious to common sense. hy·per·bo·le /haɪˈpɜrbəli/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hahy-pur-buh-lee] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –noun Rhetoric. 1. obvious and intentional exaggeration. 2. an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.” There you go. When the critisisms hold no water, what do you expect? Oh, & @ Virus:
|
|
|
Post by Dusk on Aug 29, 2007 21:19:49 GMT -5
breaking it down then
12 foot ladder +THE RING 10 feet above ground= U being 22 feet above the ground unless my math is wrong again.
For the moonsault thing- No you don't have to be injured but it's illogical that someone who goes through that much can get into a ring under two minutes. And injuries before that moonsault play a big role in getting back up.
for the vacation thing- Then just leave it at that, not much more I can explain.
SS vs Mr.P because they read what you wrote and looked at it themselves. they saw Mr.P, SS, United Title, LMS, probably good enough for them.
For the why I shouldn't have picked the MITB2 because it was obviously something you don't want to win- what would YOU vote for anyways? I'd say I had a guess but then you'd ask me to say it an tell me I'm wrong.
for the hyperbole definition- You'll have to break that one down cause it doesn't make sense to me at the moment.
for the critisism- genereally, for people to STFU. In your case, pissing someone off.
|
|
|
Post by Booker T on Aug 29, 2007 21:35:19 GMT -5
breaking it down then What about this do you not understand? from the looks of things you quite obviously have not read the match description and have decided to add things on. THERE ARE NO 12 FOOT LADDERS!!!!! The ring will be suspended 10 feet in the air. Now thats not exactly a pleasent walk down the stairs. The ring will be moving. It'll spin, jerk, vibrate and tilt. The ring will have four ladders to get back in when you fall out these ladders may combust at anytime. Below the ring will b just the arena floor. Hanging from under the ring will be lots of weapons, which may fall from time to time. This match will definately be the most brutal match of all time. I guarenty to you, that nobody will be the same after this match. Now I would like Showstopper to come out and do one of two things. Come out here and admit that he is afraid and will conceed to the limits that I am willing to go to prove my dominance, or he can boldly accept this challenage and get beat down. Should he accept, it will happen at Winter-Feast as a double main event. So Showstopper, what do you say? TBC Showstopper, Anyone involed Please tell me you understand now. Please. And this illogical how? Nor do you need to. You shouldn't have brought it up at all tbh. So basically that's the only reason you can muster? That because lots of people might vote for it, they shouldn't. That's weak. No, it's just something that YOU want to win and will do anything to let that happen, even lie. You've shown blatant double standards in regards to this match, and for the life of me I can't figure out why. Please explain? I haven't decided yet, that's what this thread was for, to decipher which match was the best, I thought you'd have realised that but obviously not. I'm not teaching you English. That's what school's for. Why should someone STFU? because they don't agree with you? And am I pissing you off with my logic and reasoning? D@mn, I better work on that. EvRi1 VoTe 4 MiTb 2 plz CaUz IK SeD sO. Is that better?
|
|